The
publishing industry is shrinking. Year after year, the number
of books sold is decreasing as our increasingly sound-bite oriented
society flocks to movie theaters, computer screens, game consoles,
etc. Meanwhile, the proliferation of computers and the Internet
has made writing and shopping books easier than ever before. There
are literally millions of aspiring authors shopping millions of
manuscripts, of which less than 200,000 will be published. In
short, there is a huge supply of authors fighting for a small
and shrinking demand (readers). Anyone remotely connected with
publishing (agents, publishers, etc.) is constantly swamped under
authors seeking goods and services.
Worse,
60-95% of published titles fail to return their investments, meaning
that they result in a net loss for all concerned. The responsibility
for this situation rests squarely on authors shoulders.
Let me be perfectly blunt: When you query an agent or publisher,
you are literally asking them to invest resources in your book.
You are, in essence, asking them to be your venture capitalists.
Lets pretend you want to open a company and need capital.
The first thing any investor will request is your business plan,
which is a roadmap of where, when, and how your business will
reach certain milestones and the criteria you used to make those
assumptions. If the investors like your business plan, you get
the money. The investors will not run your day-to-day operations,
nor will they promote it.
As
part owners, they will oversee your actions and may pull the plug
on your whole operation if reality does not match the plans. Who
does that sound like? If you said most publishers,"
youre spot-on.
Lets
summarize: You are a supplier of products (books) in an industry
that is chasing after ever-dwindling demand (readers). In the
midst of this situation, you are asking others to invest capital
(time and money) in your product above all of the other possible
choices. Despite this grim reality, the myths persist that publication
is the path to fame and riches and that publishers will do all
the work. As proof, look no further than the legions of disgruntled
authors who blame anyone and anything for their woes but the one
place where the responsibility truly belongs: on their own shoulders.
What
does this have to do with scams? Everything. Like any industry,
the publishing world has evolved a set of traditions and norms
that constitute acceptable practices. Anything falling outside
those norms is viewed with suspicion. Lets look at a few
examples:
Fee-charging
agents. The
Association of Author Representatives allows member agents to
bill authors for the costs of copies, phone calls, etc. incurred
as a result of representing that author--but God forbid one of
them should charge any sort of upfront fee. My first agent charged
me $75 and contacted several major publishers on my behalf. I
ran the numbers on the copies he made and figured Id gotten
a pretty good deal, comparable to my local copy shop and I was
spared the hassle of making and mailing copies. My second agent
never charged me a cent but concocted fictitious reviews
from places like the New York Times, Boston Globe, etc.
I then worked for my third agent as her Submissions Editor. This
tiny company didnt advertise or promote itself, yet we received
a steady and growing stream of queries. I can only imagine the
snowstorm had we marketed the agency. In response, I, like most
editors, quickly learned to search for reasons to reject manuscripts.
Most were dismissed at the query level. Of the manuscripts I requested,
most never made it past the first paragraph. This may seem heartless,
but a company whose livelihood depends on professional gambling
cannot waste a second on any doubtful investments. In light of
this, is an agent who charges a fee to give each submission a
thorough read scamming authors or merely trying to offer a potentially
valuable service and be compensated for it?
Subsidy
publishers.
Why the hell should I pay to have my book published?
is a common refrain from authors. Well, I went the free
route and put my money and time into promoting my books. That
publisher almost folded because most of its authors were not promoting
their books. As a result, my book series was delayed and print
availability thrown into doubt. I lost a lot of time and money
on that one. Is a publisher who charges money to ensure their
own viability in an environment where most authors cling to long-dead
myths a scam?
Pitching
services to authors. How
dare someone make a living from authors? And yet publishers and
agents do exactly that. You have no qualms about paying money
for food, cable TV, Internet, or any of the other goods and services
you consume, so why apply that label to a service designed for
authors?
Excessive
marketing.
Recently, there was a thread on one of the forums I haunt complaining
about a company that is adept at making its presence known to
authors. The complaints were twofold: frequency of promotions
and overpricing. Is this a scam? Well, lets see. If you
know the company Im talking about, then their marketing
has been a success. Of all the companies out there doing various
things for (and to) authors, you know their name. Why? Because
their promotional emails arrive at your email box regular as clockwork.
My guess is you would kill for that kind of name recognition!
As for price, yes, hundreds of dollars to send out a few thousand
emails might seem exorbitant. Consider, however, the effort and
cost that went into creating the lists and the ongoing cost of
maintenance. Consider also your time and effort to go out and
build the same list yourself. Doesnt seem so bad, does it?

Owning
related services or referring authors to other services is another
huge no-no. Referrals are the general economys lifeblood.
Affiliations are the wave of the future. If you hire a gardener,
you can bet s/he has a relationship with at least one local nursery
where s/he gets discounts on plants, a de facto referral fee. In
the real world, it is safe to assume that Business A
is getting some compensation for referring you to Business B. And
why not? If Business B complements As offerings, then B gets
a steady stream of ready-to-buy customers without the hassle of
mounting a traditional marketing campaign. Network marketing is
another prime example. Why do these arrangements exist? The economy
is decentralizing at breakneck speed and society is awash in advertisements.
In this environment, partnering for mutual success is cost-effective
to the point that doing anything else means almost certain doom.
But heaven forbid that a publisher refers you to an editor- or,
worse, has one on staff (for a fee, of course).
I
could go on and on, but I think you get the idea. To say that
a practice is bad is a bit like saying that hammers are bad. The
same hammer that builds houses that give people shelter and comfort
can just as easily kill people. When the latter happens, no one
presumes to blame the hammer; after all, it is only the tool.
Besides, no tool exists without a demonstrated need. One simply
does not design a tool for a non-existent need, real or perceived.
In
the publishing industry, the need for agents to give serious attention
to authors without going broke in the process gave rise to fee-charging.
The instability of small presses and authors fervent need
to see their books in print (good or not) gave rise to subsidy
presses. If you examine every bad practice out there,
you can trace its roots directly back to some unfilled need. Thus,
in my opinion, there are no bad practices, at least
not at face value.
Oh
there are scams. Find a vulnerability and it will be exploited.
Its a sad fact of life. Yes, there are bad fee-charging
agents. Yes, there are subsidy presses that will publish any tripe
that arrives with a check enclosed. Yes, there are presses that
have in-house editors. Yes, there are several marketing and other
companies who make their presence overly well known (is that so
wrong?). Yes, there are services that seem grossly overpriced.
And there are outright criminals. The publishing industry holds
no monopoly on scams.
A
long time ago, I discovered what I call the One Bastard Rule,
where one schmuck ruins it for everyone. That law making it illegal
to tie an elephant to a fire hydrant? It may sound stupid, but
its a sucker bet that someone once tied an elephant to a
fire hydrant with calamitous results. In publishing, the actions
of a few lead to sweeping norms that define acceptable
versus unacceptable behavior.
So
whats my point? I have two. First, dont be in such
a rush to apply the S word. If someone promises a
certain result and willfully does not deliver, that is indeed
a scam. But if they do what they promise, then the worst one can
say is that they delivered the agreed service at the agreed price-
hardly dishonest. Second, invest the time and effort to learn
about this industry you belong to. Take charge of your career.
Learn all there is to know about companies, readers, fellow authors,
etc. Define goals and how you plan to achieve them. In short,
treat your finished book and your writing with the same level
of care and diligence with which you treated your manuscript.
Make decisions that will further your interests and accord others
the same professional respect. If you are defrauded (meaning that
you do not receive a promised good or service), then by all means
report it. Otherwise, dear reader, in the end, you only have yourself
to thank- or blame. The fact that you made a bad choice does not
make that choice bad for everyone.
Caveat
emptor.
Expect
success. Plan for it. Then go make it happen. You deserve it!
Just
my 2 cents' worth!
Anthony
Hernandez is
the founder of Dawnstar Books, the producer of video (VHS) seminars
that guide authors through the publication/marketing/sales processes.
Visit DawnStar Books at http://www.dawnstarbooks.com
or contact Anthony via email at anthony@dawnstarbooks.com